Skip to main content

Meaning and Evolution of concept of Human Rights

INTRODUCTION 

Human beings are born equal in dignity and rights. These are moral claims which are inalienable and inherent in all individuals by virtue of their humanity alone, irrespective of caste, colour, creed, and place of birth, sex, cultural difference or any other consideration. These claims are articulated and formulated in what is today known as human rights. Human rights are sometimes referred to as fundamental rights, basic rights, inherent rights, natural rights and birth rights. Thus, there is universal acceptance of human rights in principle in domestic and international plane.

Human rights are exemptions from the operation of arbitrary power. An individual can seek human rights only in an organized community, i.e., a State, or in other words, where the civil social order exists. No one can imagine to invoke them in a state of anarchy where there is hardly any just power to which a citizen can appeal against the violations of rights. Thus, the principle of the protection of human rights is derived from the concept of man as a person and his relationship with an organized society which cannot be separated from universal human nature.

DEFINITION

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948, defines human rights as “rights derived from the inherent dignity of the human person.” Human rights when they are guaranteed by a written constitution are known as “Fundamental Rights” because a written constitution is the fundamental law of the state.  

CHARACTERISTICS AND NATURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS 

1. Human Rights are Inalienable - Human rights are conferred on an individual due to the very nature of his existence. They are inherent in all individuals irrespective of their caste, creed, religion, sex and nationality. Human rights are conferred to an individual even after his death. The different rituals in different religions bear testimony to this fact. 

 2. Human Rights are Essential and Necessary - In the absence of human rights, the moral, physical, social and spiritual welfare of an individual is impossible. Human rights are also essential as they provide suitable conditions for material and moral upliftment of the people. 

 3. Human Rights are in connection with human dignity - To treat another individual with dignity irrespective of the fact that the person is a male or female, rich or poor etc. is concerned with human dignity. For eg. In 1993, India has enacted a law that forbids the practice of carrying human excreta. This law is called Employment of Manual Scavengers and Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act. 

 4. Human Rights are Irrevocable: Human rights are irrevocable. They cannot be taken away by any power or authority because these rights originate with the social nature of man in the society 7 | Page of human beings and they belong to a person simply because he is a human being. As such human rights have similarities to moral rights. 

 5. Human Rights are Necessary for the fulfillment of purpose of life: Human life has a purpose. The term “human right” is applied to those conditions which are essential for the fulfillment of this purpose. No government has the power to curtail or take away the rights which are sacrosanct, inviolable and immutable. 

 6. Human Rights are Universal – Human rights are not a monopoly of any privileged class of people. Human rights are universal in nature, without consideration and without exception. The values such as divinity, dignity and equality which form the basis of these rights are inherent in human nature. 

 7. Human Rights are never absolute – Man is a social animal and he lives in a civic society, which always put certain restrictions on the enjoyment of his rights and freedoms. Human rights as such are those limited powers or claims, which are contributory to the common good and which are recognized and guaranteed by the State, through its laws to the individuals. As such each right has certain limitations. 

 8. Human Rights are Dynamic - Human rights are not static, they are dynamic. Human rights go on expanding with socio-eco-cultural and political developments within the State. Judges have to interpret laws in such ways as are in tune with the changed social values. For eg. The right to be cared for in sickness has now been extended to include free medical treatment in public hospitals under the Public Health Scheme, free medical examinations in schools, and the provisions for especially equipped schools for the physically handicapped. 

 9. Rights as limits to state power - Human rights imply that every individual has legitimate claims upon his or her society for certain freedom and benefits. So human rights limit the state's power. These may be in the form of negative restrictions, on the powers of the State, from violating the inalienable freedoms of the individuals or in the nature of demands on the State, i.e. positive obligations of the State. For eg. Six freedoms that are enumerated under the right to liberty forbid the State from interfering with the individual.   

 THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 

 The evolutions of human rights have taken place over centuries. Man had to struggle hard in order to achieve the ultimate goal – living with dignity – which still has to be realized in various societies. The world recognized the U.N.Charter of 1945 which states that human rights are inalienable aspect of mankind. The origin of human rights may be traced to the theory of Natural Rights derived from the concept of Natural Law, as propounded by ancient Greek Stoic Philosophers and further developed by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. The American and French Revolution gave further impetus to the struggle of human rights. The evolution and development of human rights in the international context can be traced to the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights followed by the French Declaration and the American Bill of Rights.  

1 The Magna Carta, 1215

 The Magna Carta, also known as the Great Charter, of 1215 is the most significant constitutional document of all human history. The main theme of it was protection against the arbitrary acts by the king. The 63 clauses of the Charter guaranteed basic civic and legal rights to citizens, and protected the barons from unjust taxes. The English Church too gained freedom from royal interferences. King John of England granted the Magna Carta to the English barons on 15th June 1215. The king was compelled to grant the Charter, because the barons refused to pay heavy taxes unless the king signed the Charter. 

2. The Natural Rights Theory

Thomas Hobbes (1588 – 1679), John Locke (1632 – 1704) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712 – 1778) are the three main thinkers who developed the Natural Rights theory. 

 Thomas Hobbes was the first champion of the theory of "natural rights". In his celebrated book, "Leviathan", he advocated that no individual could ever be deprived of the right to life, which he enjoyed in the state of nature. He asserted that all human beings are equal, without any consideration. 

John Locke developed the idea further in his book, "Two Treatises Government". He argued that every human being has a natural right to life, personal liberty, and property, and that no governmental authority has power to deprive individuals of these rights because they had enjoyed them even before the creation of the civil or political society.

Rousseau is regarded as the greatest master of natural law school. In his celebrated book, "The Social Contract", Rousseau states that “All men are born free but everywhere they are in chains." Rousseau proclaimed that men are bestowed with inalienable rights of liberty, equality and fraternity. These concepts became the basis for the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.    

 3. The English Bill of Rights, 1689

The next source and avenue of the development of the philosophy of human rights is the English Bill of Rights, enacted on December 16, 1689, by the British Parliament. The British Parliament declared its supremacy over the Crown in clear terms. The English Bill of Rights declared that the king has no overriding authority. The Bill of Rights codified the customary laws, and clarified the rights and liberties of the citizens. It lays down the twin foundations, viz., the supremacy of the law, and the sovereignty of the nation, upon which, the English constitution rests. 

 4. American Declaration of Independence, 1776

 The first colonies to revolt against England were the thirteen States of America. These states declared their independence from their mother country on 4th July 1776. The declaration charges the king with tyranny and affirms the independence of the American colonies. The declaration of independence has great significance in the history of mankind as it justified the right to revolt against a government that no longer guaranteed the man‟s natural and inalienable rights. 

 5. The U.S. Bill of Rights, 1791

 The U.S. Constitution was enacted on 17th September 1787. The most conspicuous defect of the original constitution was the omission of a Bill of Rights concerning private rights and personal liberties. Madison, therefore proposed as many as twelve amendments in the form of Bill of Rights. Ten of these were ratified by the State legislatures. These ten constitutional amendments came to be known as the Bill of Rights. The overall theme of the Bill of Rights is that the citizen be protected against the abuse of power by the officials of the States. 

 6. The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 1789 

 The fall of Bastille and the abolition of feudalism, serfdom and class privileges by the National Assembly ushered France into a new era. On 4th August 1789, the National Assembly proclaimed the Rights of Man and of the Citizens. The Rights were formulated in 17 Articles. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen has far reaching importance not only in the history of France but also in the history of Europe and mankind. The declaration served as the death warrant for the old regime and introduced a new social and political order, founded on the noble and glittering principles. Further the declaration served as the basis for many Constitutions, framed in different countries, where the framers gave top priority to human rights. 

 7. Declaration of International Rights of Man, 1929

After World War I, questions about human rights and fundamental freedoms began to be raised. In 1929, the Institute of International Law adopted the Declaration of International rights of Man. The Declaration declared that fundamental rights of citizen, recognized and guaranteed by several domestic constitutions, especially those of the French and the U.S.A constitutions, were in reality meant not only for citizens of the states but for all men all over the world, without any consideration. 

 8. The UN Charter, 1945

The United Nations Charter was drafted, approved and unanimously adopted by all the delegates of the 51 states, who attended the United Nations Conference at San Francisco. The UN Charter contains provisions for the promotion and protection of human rights. The importance of the  Charter lies in the fact that it is the first official document in which the use of „human rights‟ is, for the first time traceable and which also recognized the respect for fundamental freedom. 

 9. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948

 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10th December, 1948. The Declaration consists of thirty Articles and covers civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights for all men, women and children. The declaration however is not a legally binding document. It is an ideal for all mankind. 

 10. International Covenants on Human Rights 

 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 was not a legally binding document. It lacked enforcements. This deficiency was sought to be removed by the U.N. General Assembly by adopting in December, 1966, the two Covenants, viz, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Examination of Injured Persons

Who examines the injured person?  A medical officer or a casualty medical officer known as Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP). [Explanation (b) to Section 53 Crpc (now S.51 BNSS)-"registered medical practitioner" means a medical practitioner who possesses any medical qualification as defined in clause (h) of Section 2 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) and whose name has been entered in a State Medical Register.] What is an Accident register MLR?  The details of examination is entered in an accident register for the purpose of preparing a medicolegal injury report (MLR). It is a confidential record. It has to be produced in court if required by court of law. It is maintained by all the government hospitals. Patient may be an outpatient or admitted in ward.  Prior to a medicolegal examination, informed consent must be obtained from the injured party or from a legal guardian if the injured is unable to give consent. According to the...

Cause of Death from Wounds

 An autopsy is generally the most accurate method available to determine the cause of death during murder cases and consequently, whether the fatality was innocent or in fact a disguised murder. Different measures are taken under different situations and with it being rather difficult to explain every single scenario possible, below are some common examples, which may likely perk your interest. An assailant is not responsible for the death of his victim occurring on receiving an injury, if it can be proved from post-mortem examination that it was due to natural causes, such as cerebral or subarachonoid haemorrhage, heart disease, particularly of coronary artery, hypertension or any other pathological condition or poisoning, and that the  infliction of the injury did not operate in any way, immediately or remotely, to cause the death which might have occurred at the time even if the injury had not been inflicted.  To substantiate a charge of murder or culpable homi...

Medico-Legal aspect of Wounds

 Medico-Legal Aspect of Wounds is one of the prime areas of Forensic studies.  Examination of injuries and wounds help a great deal in the discovery of the method of crime and the time of death (if any) and nature of weapon used in the crime. The examination of an injured person is a complex process and requires great care and caution as in many cases, whole investigation may depend on it.  After the examination of an injured person, the examining doctor prepares an injury certificate wherein he chalks out all the details regarding the nature, age, size and grievousness of injury. Along with it, the injury certificate also contains the details of the weapon used and other details as the doctor deems fit with regard to the injury.  NATURE OF INJURY   While describing the injuries in the form, the doctor should carefully note their nature and number, the character of their edges, their size as regards length, breadth and depth, the line of direction and their...